Happy Mother’s Day, everyone! Today, as promised,
I am going to muse on Paul Drake’s Dilemma. But first, a brief follow-up
on The Startled Stallion.
It’s interesting how the same scene can
apparently come across differently to two separate people. I wasn’t bothered by
Hamilton’s derogatory remarks (referred to as “snide” in the summary), at least
not during the scene I was referencing. (Earlier on someone gave a false
confession and Hamilton promptly accused Perry of setting it up. While some of
the stuff Hamilton accuses him of has basis in fact, that doesn’t, so that was
most unappreciated and strange.) Hamilton’s tone was quite calm and even, not
really mocking or snide as it is sometimes. What he actually said was a comment
on Perry’s antics seeming more suited to a country fair than a courtroom. I was
kind of amused. (What Perry did there was rather shocking, although it
certainly had the results he hoped for.) And the judge wasn’t reprimanding Hamilton,
as I saw it. He just calmly said that the court had been informed of Perry’s
plan. I was happy when Hamilton said that he was aware of that, still in
a calm and mature tone.
On to Paul Drake’s Dilemma. It, along with
The Prudent Prosecutor, was something I had longed to see for years,
ever since learning of its existence from The Perry Mason TV Show Book.
I’ll be honest in that I’ve never really been crazy about plots where someone
in the main cast is accused of a crime and ends up in jail and on trial. For
some reason, that’s one thing that tends to rub me the wrong way. I guess I
hate seeing someone I really care about behind bars. (Although it’s not often
as tense a situation on Perry as it is on more recent shows.) I made an
exception for Paul Drake’s Dilemma, due to what I’d learned about how
Hamilton behaves in it.
The episode concerns a hit-and-run accident, with
the driver a son-in-law in a wealthy business family. Not wanting a lot of
embarrassing publicity concerning the incident, the patriarch decides that they
have to cover it up. And they’ll pay the widow off, secretly.
Frank Thatcher, the son-in-law, cooks up a phony
story to feed Paul in order to get him to try to give the money to the widow.
Paul falls for it at first, but after talking with the widow some of the puzzle
pieces in Frank’s story fall out of place.
Now that he starts to realize he’s being used, Paul
becomes furious. He seeks Frank out in the apartment of an old flame of his, an
aspiring singer. Eventually they get into a fight, started by Frank. But the
angry Paul says he’s glad Frank did that. He strikes back. Frank, however, soon
clubs Paul over the head and leaves him unconscious on the floor.
Paul wakes up with a record playing over and over
on the phonograph (a crucial detail later), the police pounding on the door,
and Frank dead, shot twice with Paul’s gun.
Both Tragg and Hamilton are upset about the case.
Tragg sadly wonders why Paul had to get mixed up in a mess like this in the
first place. Hamilton tells Perry that, being a public servant, there’s not
much he can do. He says this without Perry having said anything. And he is oh
so clearly regretful and saddened. Perry is understanding of Hamilton’s
position.
Perry and Paul have a wonderful friendship scene
when Perry goes to talk with him. After Paul tells about what happened and the
evidence stacked against him, including the fact that he has powder on his
hands from recent shooting practice, he asks Perry if there’s anything else
Perry wants to ask. The implication is that he wonders if Perry will ask if
Paul killed Frank. But Perry just smiles and says the only doubts he has are
what Paul will say when he sees the bill.
During the hearing Hamilton looks to Paul more
than once, seeming to be absolutely agonized over having to prosecute him. Paul
unfortunately remains deadpan, although at one point he looks away and then
back again, possibly as though uncomfortable with Hamilton’s discomfort. Della,
on the other hand, more clearly reacts to Hamilton’s feelings with her
attentive expression.
The episode would have been a marvelous chance
for a scene between Hamilton and Paul. They surely must have interacted;
Hamilton had to talk with him before the hearing. But I’ve seen the uncut
version of this episode and there is no such scene. I’m grateful for the silent
exchanges between them, though. We’re left quite puzzled on Paul’s feelings,
but Hamilton’s are apparent.
When he tells Perry to cross-examine one
particularly damning witness, he speaks quietly and barely discernibly, just as
he does many seasons later in The Positive Negative when he doesn’t want
to prosecute the retired General. And while Perry cross-examines the apartment
manager and scores a few points, Hamilton is in the background smiling and
seeming to be enjoying it. When it concludes with the gallery laughing over the
final point (concerning the shooting down of the manager’s faulty claim that he
gets along well with everyone—except, it seems, his past four wives),
Hamilton chuckles as well.
The episode winds to its conclusion when Perry
points out the record being played in the murder room was a demo record and
wonders how it ended up there. The singer’s manager finally confesses to the
murder, due to Frank’s ill treatment of the girl through so many years. The
girl, heartbroken, sobs on the railing of the witness stand.
One other source of disappointment to me is that
Paul doesn’t have any speaking parts after the hearing starts, save for a brief
conversation with Perry at the noon break. It’s Paul’s episode, and yet he
doesn’t even appear in the epilogue. It almost seems as though the wealthy
family is the real driving force behind the episode, as the epilogue involves
Perry interacting with the patriarch.
It is a very good and rather chilling conclusion,
as throughout the episode the man has been hindering the case and hiding
evidence, believing that one of his children is the murderer. (He even buys the
recording studio the girl is trying to sell her record to and then bribes her
into refusing to help Perry and Paul as she previously said she would!) He
calls Perry in the epilogue wanting to offer him a check. Perry tells him that
even though Paul is “just a friend”, Perry never once doubted his innocence.
(And they’re going to dinner. Paul will pay the bill and that is the fee for
Perry defending him.) But this man is so far removed from reality that he
believed every one of his children capable of committing murder. Perry tears
the check in half and leaves.
I wonder if a subtle thing the episode tries to
bring out is the good and bad of humanity. Not that every episode doesn’t do
that to some extent, but it seems more prominent here, especially with that focus
on it in the epilogue. We have the girl, who knows information that could help
prove Paul innocent, refusing to help him because her career is suddenly at
stake due to her recording studio being bought out. We have the wealthy
patriarch, doing everything he can to not get his family name dragged through
the mud because he doesn’t want bad publicity. And on the other hand we have
Perry fully believing in Paul’s guiltlessness in the crime and Hamilton’s anguish
over having to prosecute him.
(There are also shades of gray, in the murderer’s
motive. His outrage over Frank Thatcher’s treatment of the girl, while not a
justification for murder, still doesn’t rank him with the very worst of the Perry criminals.)
In spite of any flaws or things that could have
been done different, the episode is well-written and amazing. And it’s a
milestone episode in that we see how Hamilton reacts when really being faced
with prosecuting one of these frustrating people he runs across time and again.
It isn’t hard to believe that Paul would think Hamilton would gloat, especially
after Paul’s vocal dislike of him in season 1. Instead, Hamilton’s behavior
couldn’t have been further from that.
I’ve
toyed off and on with the possibility of a short story involving missing scenes
and unseen thoughts from that episode, particularly where Hamilton and Paul are
concerned. After seeing the episode again I had enough inspiration to write it.
It’s part of my current Livejournal writing project, and features Paul flashing
back on the events while searching for Tragg in The Broken Ties. It will
be posted there on the 21st, although I’m so pleased with it that it’s
tempting to put it up today on fanfiction.net.
Who is singing the song I need a man?
ReplyDeleteGood question! The actress's name is Vanessa Brown, but there's no indication whether she sang it herself or if someone else dubbed it in.
DeleteCould it be Cleo Lane?
ReplyDeleteHmm, it doesn't sound like Cleo Laine's voice to me. Maybe it is the actress playing the character, Vanessa Brown, and it wasn't dubbed in.
DeleteThis episode was certainly odd (Paul Drake a murderer?) but highly involving in numerous ways. Sad to find a fellow audio professional out to be the killer. I always enjoyed looking at hearing Jennifer Howard the few times she appeared on the show. Indeed I found the rest of the cast of this episode especially memorable. Vanessa Brown turns out to have had a very interesting background: A 165 IQ, a big film (and presumably TV) music enthusiast (yes!) and during her twilight years had great things to say about 90s rap music. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0114847/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm So maybe that was her on the recording.
DeleteAlso, speaking of Paul, here's an off episode question, as I'm trying to find the title of another one. I don't know the season or the names of any of the actors or characters The story again involves music professionals but I only recall one scene: Paul enters a club or other venue where singers and other performers seek time to display there talents. There we hear a warbling female vocalist ("some canary" says Paul during his phone or live chat with Perry). That's all I remember. Any idea which episode?
ReplyDeleteThanks for your interesting info on Vanessa Brown! I wasn't too happy about who the killer ended up being myself.
DeleteI can't think what this other episode is at the moment, but I remember the scene. I will think about it. :)
Thanks, as I’d appreciate finding every likeable episode I can.
DeleteFor my tastes, beyond season five it starts getting harder to find characters and stories which aren’t annoying and kind of silly, though there are some fine exceptions (e.g. “telltale tap).
Hopefully, the currently unknown one of interest I’ll have on DVD.
I'm not sure myself, but it definitely isn't Cleo Laine. If I had to guess,
ReplyDeleteI'd say Sarah Vaughn, or an American singer of that generation.
BINGO!
DeleteCOT Blind Man's Bluff https://www.perrymasontvseries.com/wiki/index.php/EpisodePages/Show114 I don't recall which was Paul's "canary" but that's the episode. It also has Geraldine Wall in a minor role, who I loved in COT Petulant Partner; one of several actors who I wish had more time on this show.
Delete