I hope everyone had a good New Year! It isn’t one
of my favorite holidays, as we don’t do much to celebrate. (I would love to
attend an Oriental New Year’s celebration sometime!) But hopefully it will be a
good year, filled with Perry goodness.
I actually had a topic on Thursday, but then I
wasn’t feeling well and had to put it on hold. And then Friday night came along
and provided another topic, so the original one has been put on hold again.
So for once I caught a Perry movie while
it was actually on the air. I kind of wish I hadn’t, because then I would have
recorded it for later and we’d have a copy that could be kept. I wasn’t
planning to record it since we’d be there to watch it at the time. How was I to
know that it would end up having such an exciting twist?
I imagine there are some purists who don’t like
that The Lady in the Lake ended up with the murder victim not being dead,
considering that a real murder is part of the Perry formula. But considering
who the victim was, I’m thrilled!
I had thought the victim would probably be that
awful Lisa person. When instead it was the wife, I was deeply disappointed. She
was certainly among the handful of characters who didn’t deserve it in the
least. To have her be alive and held prisoner was wonderful, in my estimation.
And even aside from that, just looking at it from a story structure standpoint,
I think it’s good to jar up a formula now and then. It keeps things fresh and
new and puts people on their toes, wondering when next something might be
different.
The one thing that puzzles me is who the Lisa
person is. For a while, I honestly thought she was the sister, having survived
and come back for revenge—which would be ungodly depressing, considering how
horrible Sarah felt about standing by and watching her end up in the water. In
the flashback at the beginning, the sister has red hair, even though the
paintings of the girls both feature blonde hair. And Lisa’s hair is very
strikingly red. When they found the sister’s brush in that motel room, it
seemed to cinch the idea all the more.
Unless the movie was edited, there’s only one
point where they could have explained the brush—right after the final
commercial break and before the big reveal in court of Sarah’s survival. At
that point, our local station made their commercials run so long that it cut
into the movie’s return. Ugh. That’s been happening a lot lately and I’m
getting sick of it. They need to time their commercials better!
I’m assuming that the Lisa person was instead
exactly who she said she was and that she wasn’t the sister at all. Perhaps the
brush was something Sarah was keeping. Or perhaps Lisa had it to taunt Sarah
with. But I was definitely left confused when that angle didn’t appear to be
explained in what I watched.
I also thought the evidence against the husband
was rather flimsy. It would have felt more believable if he and Sarah didn’t
get along well or even if their argument had been more intense. On the other
hand, though, I really loved how their relationship was portrayed, for the most
part, and I wouldn’t have liked to have seen that be changed.
I just wish Sarah would have been more receptive
to the truth that Lisa was the one engineering the kiss and Sarah’s husband
didn’t want it. It always annoys me when one member of a couple shows such a
lack of faith in the other half. Of course, if she hadn’t been upset and gone
out, then Lisa wouldn’t have cornered and abducted her at that point, but I’m
sure they could have reworked the script a bit so that there was another reason
why she went out.
I still think Paul Jr. can’t hold a candle to his
dad as far as private-eyeing goes. And it really made me roll my eyes when he
decided to pretend to be the thug the defendant’s brother thought he was, in
order to try to get information from him. It worked for a bit, but it certainly
backfired on him! I imagine that’s why Paul Sr. hardly ever did stunts like
that. As I recall, he was usually always up front about being a private
detective. And he had a pretty good track record of getting information.
At least, though, I liked how determined Paul Jr.
was to finally catch up to Lisa and her companion. Paul Jr. was the one who
actually rescued Sarah from her captivity, so he must be given credit for that.
I was very glad to see him corner Lisa at last, after he kept bumbling through
the case. And no matter Lisa’s motives in keeping Sarah alive, I have to be
thankful to her that she did.
It was fun to see David Ogden Stiers as the
prosecutor. He did a good job, although I was hoping to see him and Perry get a
little more involved in having conflicting feelings about how the case was
going. I like when that’s happening with Perry and Hamilton, as long as it’s
handled without casting a bad light on either side and doesn’t dissolve into
wildly flying accusations about the attorneys’ conduct.
I adore the reunion scene in court, when Sarah is
brought in alive and she and her husband embrace. I just wish we had seen them
again in the epilogue, although it was amusing when the epilogue consisted of Della
insisted that Perry wouldn’t be skiing again.
All the cast did an excellent job, although most
of them are unknown to me. The only guest-star other than David Ogden Stiers that
I’m familiar with is David Hasselhoff. Knight Rider is a fun show that I
enjoy watching sometimes. I never saw Baywatch.
Overall, I found it a very satisfying entry in
the Perry movie series. And although I don’t consider the movies part of
the canon, I like this one so much that I’d like to say that I imagine a
version of it happening “off-screen” in the television series, if that makes
sense.
I’ve
kind of thought of bringing a few of the movies’ characters, including David’s
and Scott Baio’s prosecutors, into my stories. They’d be the same ages as they
are in the movies, only the Perry they would encounter would be the television
series Perry instead of the movie Perry. In other words, they would be part of
my extended television series ventures instead of being at work twenty-odd
years after the events of the series.
No comments:
Post a Comment