So, thanks to MeTV, I finally got around to
seeing The Glass Coffin. I was very glad that one of the readers was
right and there weren’t any onscreen tricks that were grotesque illusions of cutting people up, although the
thing they’re doing with the boxes at the very beginning was probably meant to
be one of those.
Overall, it was definitely one of the
installments I’ve liked the best. In some ways it felt very much like one of
the episodes, especially when Perry moved that the trial take place right at
the theatre.
We have a defendant who is definitely flawed,
having fooled around with the murder victim at one time (albeit only when he
was drunk). I was worried for a while that maybe his wife would turn out to be
the murderer, especially when Perry emphasized to her that she had to be in
court the next day. I was very glad that she was not the guilty one and that
she and David were going to be able to work things out.
I kind of suspected the female side of the guilty
pair, although I don’t think I ever suspected the other. And I definitely
didn’t suspect the reason. I thought she might just be a jealous star kicked to
the curb. I was pleased that there was a more substantial reason than that,
although of course it still wasn’t justified even though the woman was indeed
horrid.
I really liked how Perry pieced together how the
crime was actually committed. I had wondered if the girl might have been killed
before the fall, but I definitely didn’t dream up all of the details Perry
presented!
I loved the opening statements of both the prosecutor and Perry. And the trick Perry did with the glass. Heh! That was definitely an amusing way to prove his point, and I can certainly imagine Hamilton exclaiming about courtroom tricks if Perry had done it in the series.
Ken had his usual “I work alone” attitude, which
is always kind of irritating, and he was a bit of a jerk near the beginning to
mislead the female detective as he did. But of course, they ended up working
together eventually anyway, and it was interesting how the writers tried to
bring out the strengths and weaknesses of both of them. The girl may have been
good at finding things, but Ken was very “fly by the seat of his pants”
resourceful during tight moments. I really liked that the chase scene, instead of being the usual scene of Ken chasing the suspect, was the bad guys chasing him. That was a good way to mix it up. And it was nice that things didn’t get
overtly romantic between him and the girl at any point. I really like seeing guys and girls
interact in other types of ways, instead of always ending up falling into
romantic attraction (especially when the girls are rarely ever seen again).
I was thinking while watching how the movies
stretch things out by trying to inject a bit of humor here and there, like when
Ken is accosted by the bad guys while only in his shorts and later, when he tries to sober up the drunk. I remember the episode The Candy Queen
in particular, and how Paul mentioned he was going to try to get Mark Chester
awake and talking by the time Perry got up there. I wonder if, had they shown
the scene of Paul working on him, if it would have gone something like the
scene in the movie. It was also highly amusing in the movie when, at the end of
the wild escape in the truck, the drunk exclaims that he’s sober.
There isn’t much interaction between Perry and
Della to speak of here, although poor Della having to call 258 optometrists! I
love the little exchange where she matter-of-factly informs him that there are
258 and not 257. I could definitely picture that happening in the series. In
fact, I think it did a couple of times, with Paul instead of Della.
I liked the brief subplot of the children’s
charity. Perry posing with the kids near the beginning was adorable. And the
ending of the film, with David and Sara going to adopt two of them, was very
sweet. It was a very nice way for the movie to end.
I’ll
probably just keep the copy I recorded many months ago, instead of recording
over it as planned. It was good enough that I think I’d like to hang on to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment