Well, it’s another September the 19th,
which means it’s time for the most controversial post of the year: the birthday
tribute to Karl Held!
I believe it was last year when someone finally
explained to me the other main reason why Karl’s David Gideon character is so
disliked. As I recall, it’s because the character has a tendency to sometimes
act like he knows it all and/or tries to explain things that don’t need
explaining? The person mentioned some occasions where he explains some things
to Della and she has an expression like, “You don’t have to lecture me, David.”
I’ll agree that David does have those moments.
And admittedly, I know some people in real-life who are like that. They are
quite annoying. But on the other hand, I’m honestly a bit amused by them,
because in general, they really aren’t trying to do anything wrong. They’re
just sharing their enthusiasm and maybe letting it get a little out of hand.
They don’t even really stop to think that maybe they don’t need to say this or
that. So even that reason doesn’t make me dislike the character.
However, this much I will say: the commenter also
noted that David does not act like that in The Grumbling Grandfather, in
spite of his idolization of Perry. I do think it’s rather a pity that they
changed the characterization in season 5, instead of sticking a little more
with what the character was to begin with. Perhaps he wouldn’t be nearly
universally disliked if they had taken a more season 4-influenced path and kept
the character more as he was in his first appearance.
But regardless, it certainly wasn’t Karl Held’s
fault that the characterization was altered. He just worked with the material
he was given. Apparently those moments were actually in the script. I suppose
perhaps delivering the lines differently could have made some level of
difference, but maybe it was the director’s choice and not Karl’s to deliver
the lines the way he did. There just isn’t enough information on that period of
Perry to really judge what happened.
I wonder if anyone has ever even interviewed Karl
about his time on Perry? It would be interesting to get the story from
his point-of-view.
I still haven’t quite found a place for David in
my Perry stories. I used him in The Case of the Spiteful Spirit
two years ago and that is the only appearance he’s made in my official
timeline. The Lux Aeterna stories on Livejournal remain nebulous as to
whether they’re part of the official timeline. So as far as the official
timeline goes, I have never explained where David disappeared to. Since I say
that other characters who have disappeared onscreen are still around, however,
perhaps David is just busy with law school and is still in Los Angeles, instead
of leaving it as I said in Lux Aeterna.
While looking over the previous birthday posts, I
saw I had an idea for David to maybe appear now and then, bringing Perry
interesting problems that could sometimes turn into new cases. Perhaps I will
use that idea for the next mystery story, if I continue the series after The
Nefarious Necklace. I just hope that
if I do decide to use David as a main guest-star in a story, that fact alone
wouldn’t make a lot of readers decide not to bother reading!
It would have been neat, as I’ve said before, if
there had been more canon scenes of Perry mentoring David in the ways of the
law. Perhaps it could have been more like Perry’s relationship with Ken in the
movies. Of course, I imagine that even if David’s characterization had been
handled better, viewers wouldn’t have liked if the series had followed him to
the end of his law school studies and had Perry take him on as another lawyer
in the firm, as he did with Ken. That definitely would have changed the scope
of the series a bit, probably unfavorably. I doubt I would go that route in my
stories, but I would like to do some of the mentoring scenes. I will also
likely try to characterization David a little more like in The Grumbling
Grandfather.
I was a little worried that some readers might
mistakenly think that the mechanic character in Necklace is supposed to
be David and that he failed law school, but since there are many guest-star
characters on Perry named David, I figured I would let it slide. The
character is called David for a reason, so I didn’t want to try to find a
different name that would work just as well. However, I did realize, much to my
chagrin, that I accidentally started a pattern once I gave the character a
surname. Both Davids have first and last names of Biblical characters: David
Gideon and David Solomon! Oh well, it works.
As
before, I feel that David Gideon is a character who had a lot of untapped
potential. I’m glad that Karl brought him to life and gave it a good try for
those nine episodes. I hope he has a very happy birthday!
As you stated, David was too preachy and no one can out lawyer Perry Mason and David really tried. he was not needed but pushed Della and Paul away and they often struggled with screen time. Thank goodness they were smart enough to let him go.
ReplyDeleteWell, that wasn't exactly what I said; I just said he had know-it-all moments. I also said it didn't really bother me. :) I don't think he was deliberately trying to outlawyer Perry; he just idolized him so much that he wanted to prove himself a good legal student. Again, didn't bother me, but I do wish they'd kept the original characterization from season 4. Maybe that would have worked better or maybe not, but at least they wouldn't have changed the character in a way that made him so hated.
DeleteFrom the first episode featuring David in Grumbling Grandfather we learned that he had apparently dropped out of law school and that his grandfather had been pleased that David was now applying himself to complete his degree. Of course, this was all a ruse on David's part to carry on a relationship with a girl he had stashed away in another room of his grandfather's house. At the end of the episode it was left open that Perry would be David's mentor in his law firm with David basically doing jobs reserved for Paul Drake with a dash of legalize thrown in to make himself look smart and enthusiastic. There was an impish side to him as well especially in his scenes with Della, who was always the wiser one. I never got the impression that David was trying to undercut Burr's role, just that he was primarily window dressing to attract younger viewers. David's role grew to be tiresome and unneeded particularly alongside the three established stars--Burr, Hale, and Hopper. It happened all the time in television when a new character was introduced and eventually phased out mainly because of ratings and the direction of the show. Still, I liked his character but I don't think the producers and writers ever intended to keep him on for very long.
DeleteThanks for your comments! Always nice to see someone who isn't utterly opposed to David. Yeah, I doubt he ever could have stayed long, unless maybe they had made him a recurring character instead of trying to fit him in as part of the regular cast.
Delete