I’m not sure who keeps making these mistakes, but
The Golden Girls is another episode whose IMDB page said for a while
that Hamilton was not in it. That has been corrected now (but not by me).
It’s another one I’m just getting around to now.
And I’m not sure I’ve ever seen it before at all. Somehow I think my local
station might have always skipped it, for content, even though of course it’s
very mild. (My station is quite conservative, which I appreciate.)
When reading the summary last night, my eyebrows
shot a mile high at the mention of what the Golden Bear club was and what it
was parodying. I’ve already seen the episode of the recent detective series Monk
that parodies/comments on the same type of thing, and I was displeased with how
it was handled there, so I became leery of watching The Golden Girls at
all. But the pull of seeing a new episode was too strong. That, and my hope
that things would be handled tastefully, considering both the series and the
time period in which it was made. To my relief, I was not disappointed.
(And I’m not trying to be a prude by not naming
certain names, by the way. I simply don’t want people searching for such
keywords to find this innocent blog instead, due to those keywords registering
in a search from their usage in this entry. Or for Internet filters to block
the blog due to picking up the keywords….)
The Golden Girls
is based on season 1’s The Vagabond Vixen. Well, the remake episodes are
hit or miss, as I see it. And sometimes they forget their place as season 9
episodes instead of season 1. That was another reason I was leery. There was
one such season 1-ish moment where Perry was concerned, but surprisingly, really
nothing with Hamilton or Steve.
The basic plot of the shakedown scheme and the
not-so-innocent traveler remains the same. But everything around it is quite
different. Instead of movie people, the partners locked in conflict own the
Golden Bear club. Originally it was a respectable men’s club, but one of the
partners has warped it into a place where girls prance around as “Teddy Bears”
(instead of Bunnies. Yes.). The other partner is repulsed and horrified, but
everything he has tried to do to stop it and regain his control over the
operations has failed.
It’s the gutter-minded partner who first picks up
the crafty hitchhiker. She’s just come from the beach and has a two-piece
swimsuit on. She looks a bit apprehensive, but he says he’s been around girls
all the time with less on than that. (Not in the club, though; seriously, the
get-ups the girls wear in the club cover more than the swimsuit does!)
He stops for a pre-arranged meeting and goes into
the building. Soon the girl hears gunshots from inside. She runs and finds his
partner at a gas station. She pulls the same routine with him, wanting a ride,
and he agrees. Seeing his antique gun on the car floor, she takes it.
The next day, she shows up at the club with a
note from the first partner, written last night, saying to hire her as a Teddy
Bear. The conservative partner is not pleased, but there’s nothing he can do
about it for now.
And here I must pause and just shake my head in
disbelief at the whole Teddy Bear concept. It’s so silly. And I’m sure the
writers knew that; we’re probably meant to take it tongue-in-cheek. I fail to
see anything that sultry about girls dressed as bears, even the way they do it
on the show. And the costumes are so plain. I suppose that’s to give things a
rustic air, in keeping with the club’s roots, but still. So silly.
Well, so as per the episode it’s based on, the
first partner is found dead. And the second partner is later arrested, after
having been blackmailed by both the girl and a repulsive character claiming to
be a reporter. Eventually the hitchhiker’s blackmailing partner beats her up
and takes most of the money she got when blackmailing the defendant for his
gun.
And concerning the season 1-ish content: Perry and Paul
go to see the girl after she’s been beaten up. Della is already over there
with her, concerned after she called up terrified from the beating. Looking out the window, they see the police coming. Perry says that
they’ll high-tail it out of there, with the girl’s luggage, and after she talks
to the police she should come to Perry’s office.
I’m assuming Perry wants to get out of there
because his client’s gun is in the girl’s bag. (At least, they think it is.)
And that definitely seems like concealing/withholding evidence to me. I have to
admit, when the girl vanishes and they discover she was picked up by the
police, I felt it served them right for trying to withhold the gun.
Hamilton behaves very maturely in court as he
questions witnesses and exchanges conversation with Perry, which is just how I’d
expect to see him by season 9. When Perry exposes the key witness’s perjury,
Hamilton has to put the girl on the stand, which he had not wanted to do at
that time. (It’s not mentioned here as it was in the original, but perhaps
Hamilton was hesitant because of her tender age and was hoping it wouldn’t come
to needing her testimony.) She reveals that Perry has the gun in her bag.
Hamilton is shocked.
The bag is brought and Hamilton goes through it. Not
finding the gun, however, he does not explode as he probably would have in
season 1. Instead, he looks to Perry in utter bewilderment and calmly asks if
Perry removed the gun from the bag. Perry says No, and starts to realize that
maybe they have the wrong bag. (Either that or the gun was switched to another
one; it’s not expressly said.) Getting an idea of who the killer is and how to
trap them, he calls Steve over for help. They go to the club to find the right
bag.
As in The Vagabond Vixen, the culprit is a
woman who loves the defendant. I think she’s his secretary, but I can’t
remember if that was said, either. She breaks down and confesses when Perry
puts on a show of having to get the gun even though it will surely convict his
client.
Steve has some wonderful scenes throughout the
episode. Even Sergeant Brice gets to do a little something, as he holds back
some people from entering the dressing room during the climax. They are both
prominent all the way along, and then the epilogue brings us some more of Steve’s
palling around with Paul, which is always fun to see.
One thing I was particularly uneasy about where
the episode was concerned was how the men would react to the club. I did not
want to discover that at least one of them was a secret patron of the place or
some such thing. The writers decided, in their tasteful way, to not really say
one way or another. No one gives an opinion, positive or negative, aside from
the guest-starring partners’ conflicting views. That was probably the best way
to do it.
The closest anyone in the main cast came to
offering an opinion is in the epilogue. Clay brings a copy of the Golden Bear
magazine, which has been naughty since the one partner assumed control. Della
comments that she didn’t think Paul would be interested in the thing. Paul then
tells her that this is the first issue under the new-old format, where it has
returned to being a magazine about California and the wilderness and wildlife.
Amusingly, he and Steve then engage in a bit of
good-natured teasing as Paul discovers the centerfold. He reacts as though it’s
a picture of a girl. Steve leans over and whistles. Della wants to
see, and when Paul turns it around, it’s a sketch of a big
furry bear, a “real” Golden Bear, says Paul. Ha!
During court, there is a point where Hamilton
asks a witness if what the deceased did with the club and the magazine brought
them out of bankruptcy (and phrasing it to indicate he thought it did). It’s
denied. Hamilton, however, was just trying to find out the facts and did not
really express an opinion one way or another either.
All
in all, aside from that bit of season 1-ish/book-inspired material with Perry
hoping to get away with the gun bag, I really enjoyed the episode. I appreciated
how tastefully the subject matter was done and the way the writers chose to
handle the cast’s reactions. Perhaps it’s not an episode I would like to watch
over and over, but it certainly isn’t the worst of season 9, despite its
oddness and tongue-in-cheek elements. And the core plot, underneath all the new
twists, is very similar to The Vagabond Vixen. I find that interesting
rather than an insult to the viewers’ intelligence, as I saw from at least one
review.
No comments:
Post a Comment